Search Results for "cessed properties"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "cessed properties"

21 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Irani Chawl Structures as Unauthorized Construction. Court upholds demolition by Municipal Corporation under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, finding no violation of natural justice as notice was affixed and opportunity of hearing was given.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, residents of Irani Chawl, Prabhadevi, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their structures by the Municipal C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

14 Mar 2014

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

19 Nov 2012

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Orders in Redevelopment Project Under DCR 33(7). Petitioners offered alternative accommodation on same land but challenged eviction notices; court held that once consent is given for redevelopment, eviction is lawful and challenge is not maintainable.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Vijay Shantaram Mandavkar and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Declaration for Municipal Land in Dadar — Notification Under Section 4(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid Despite Provision of Basic Amenities. The court held that the provision of some amenities does not automatically preclude a slum declaration if the area is otherwise unfit for human habitation, and that the competent authority had applied its mind to the reports.

19 Dec 2012

The case involves a challenge by 29 occupants of Plot No.66, TPS-IV, Mahim Division, Dadar, admeasuring 1929.78 sq.mtrs, belonging to the Municipal Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Majority Consent and Sanctioned Plans Upheld. Court held that the redevelopment scheme was validly sanctioned and the petitioners' objections were not sufficient to stall the project.

13 Dec 2010

The petitioners, seventeen occupants of residential tenements in Dalal Estate, Mumbai Central, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)