Search Results for "cartelization"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Arrest Under PML Act — Validity of Arrest Under Section 19 PML Act Must Be Examined by Trial Court at Remand Stage

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Arvind Kejriwal challenging his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Prevention...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification for Borewell Drilling Due to Unreasonable Local District Restriction — Condition Restricting Participation to Contractors of Chitradurga District Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, who are contractors engaged in drilling borewells, challenged a communication dated 02-11-2023 from the Department of Backward Classe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Quality Control Order on Plastic Imports for Lack of Public Consultation. Notification under Section 16 of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 2016 set aside as mandatory pre-legislative consultation under Section 16(2) was not complied with.

The petitioner, All India HDPE/PP Woven Fabric Manufacturers' Association, challenged a Quality Control Order issued by the Government of India on 15....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...