Search Results for "cadre distinction"

140 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 140 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Seniority Dispute Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules. Transfer of Government Employee at Own Request with Consent to Specific Seniority Terms Governs Seniority Fixation in New Post, Not Original Appointment Date.

The dispute arose from the transfer of a government employee from the post of Staff Nurse to First Division Assistant in the Karnataka State services....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Promotion Select List for District Judges in Gujarat — Merit-cum-Seniority Principle Upheld. High Court's Suitability Test Components and Weightage Valid Under Rule 5 of Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the Select List dated 10.03.2023 issued by the High Court of Gujarat for prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tool Checkers' Merger with Retrospective Effect in Service Law Dispute. Central Administrative Tribunal's direction for prospective merger of cadres set aside, holding that merger must be effective from 25th June 1985.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by employees of the Union of India, primarily Tool Checkers, challenging the order of the Central Admi...