Search Results for "bus passenger injury"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Overtaking — State Fails to Prove Negligence in Head-On Collision Between Two Mini Buses Under Sections 279, 337 IPC.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of the accused, Mohandas S. Gawade, who was charged under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 337 (causing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Rash Driving Case — Confirms Sentence for Causing Grievous Hurt. Court holds that evidence of injured witnesses and mechanical inspection report sufficiently established rash and negligent driving under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC.

The petitioner, Firoz Mohammed Ali Aga, was the driver of a mini bus (registration no. GA-02/T-4897) that met with an accident on 05/03/2010 near Vadd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Conductor in Bus Accident Case Under Section 308 IPC — No Intent to Cause Death or Grievous Hurt Established. Ringing Bell Without Checking Passenger Boarding Does Not Amount to Attempt to Commit Culpable Homicide.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal against the conviction of Abdul Ansar, a bus conductor, under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Claimant's contributory negligence assessed at 50% for sitting on the footboard of a bus, reducing insurer's liability under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the claimant, Gulam Mohammad, sustained injuries while traveling as a passenger in a bus owned by Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Employee Injured While Boarding Employer's Bus. Insurer Liable as Policy Covered Vehicle and Claimant Was a Passenger Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves an appeal by the United India Insurance Company against an order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Mumbai, dated 8.10.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of ST Bus Driver Proved. Deceased Motorcyclist's Contributory Negligence Not Established; Compensation of Rs. 2,50,000 Upheld Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) against the judgment and award dated 17/8/2004 passed by the Motor Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302 and 323 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nazimoddin Mohammaddin alias Nasiroddin, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and 32...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case — Concurrent Findings of Misconduct Not Interfered With. Petitioner failed to maintain safe distance causing three deaths; Labour Court and Industrial Court concurrently upheld dismissal as proportionate punishment.

The petitioner, Syed Mumtaz Syed Moosa, was employed as a driver with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (respondent) since 1984. On 9th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Parents of Deceased Passenger Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of Railways Act, 1989. Death Caused by Fall from Overcrowded Train Constitutes an Untoward Incident.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a compensation claim by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench. The appellants, Shobhabai and Ganesh Gaikwa...