Search Results for "bribe"

748 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 748 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal, Holds Trustee of Deemed University as Public Servant Under PC Act. Interpretation of 'University' in Section 2(c)(xi) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 includes Deemed Universities.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Gujarat against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had discharged the respondent,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Discharge Order in Corruption Case — Lokayuktha Police v. G. Ramachari. Trial Court's Discharge Order Under Section 227 Cr.P.C. Set Aside as It Failed to Consider Prima Facie Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Karnataka, through the Lokayuktha Police, filed a criminal revision petition challenging the order dated 16.11.2016 passed by the Princip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Sales Tax Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manilal Bhikhabhai Makwana, was a Sales Tax Officer in Ahmedabad. The complainant, Himanshu Jayantibhai Patel, was a honey trader. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Unreliable Trap Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Asaram Dhansing Umre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No.5 of 1998 under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony insufficient to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two police constables, Ghalappa Sardar Nadgeri (accused no.1) and Gurunath Keshav Rathod (accused no.2), who were convicted by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Unreliable Witnesses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Bhimrao s/o Kondiram Wahule, was convicted by the Special Judge, Jalna, in Special Case No. 15 of 1996 for offences under Sections 7, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a corruption trap laid by the Anti Corruption Bureau, Beed, against Rajendra Dhondiba Jogdand (accused no.1), an Agricultural Off...