Search Results for "boundary marks"

49 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit Due to Lack of Proper Measurement. Court holds that re-measurement of suit field and adjoining lands is necessary to determine encroachment when description of property in plaint is insufficient under Order VII Rule 3 CPC.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Laxman Wamanrao Nagapure against the judgment and order dated 6.8.2012 passed by the learned District Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Property Dispute Over Injunction Orders — Held That First Appellate Court Erred in Granting Injunction Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Prima Facie Case Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The case involves two appeals filed by the appellants against the judgment and order of the First Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal Nos. 615/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Land Revenue Case — Tahsildar's Order Under Section 140(2) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Restored. Single Judge Erred in Quashing Mutation Entry Without Considering Appellant's Right to Be Heard and Limitation for Challenge.

The appellant, Sunil Chajed, claimed to be the owner of land measuring 1 acre and 4.08 guntas bearing Sy.No.91/1A. The Tahsildar, Bengaluru East Taluk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Over Boundary Dispute — Appellant Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Shooting Deceased During Construction of Compound Wall. The court affirmed that the dying declaration and recovery of weapon established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sadanand Shivaji Kadam, a former police inspector aged 86, was convicted by the VII Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Case — Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Ignoring Material Evidence. Findings of Appellate Court vitiated for overlooking trial court's consideration of government measurement report and boundary marks.

The appellant, Sau. Rukhmabai, filed a second appeal against the judgment of the Appellate Court which reversed the trial court's decree in her favor....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Encroachment Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Encroachment Over Agricultural Land. Removal of Encroachment Ordered Based on Cadastral Survey Evidence Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The dispute pertained to agricultural lands in village Navgan, Rajuri, Beed district. The respondent/plaintiff, Sarjerao s/o. Rama Yadav, claimed owne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Solitary Eye Witness Testimony — FIR Not Ante-Timed, Light Source Sufficient for Identification. The court held that the testimony of a solitary eye witness, if reliable and corroborated, can sustain a conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by accused Kali Prasad Singh and Santosh Kumar Singh against their conviction under Section 302 IPC for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Failing to Appreciate Preponderance of Probability and Ignoring Undisputed Title of Appellant Over Part of Suit Property.

The case involves a second appeal filed by Smt. Laxmibai Govind Bhat Korde (appellant) against the judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Revenue Authorities to Process Phodi Applications Without NOC from KIADB for Land Granted in 1939-40. The court held that KIADB has no jurisdiction over grants made prior to its establishment, and thus authorities cannot insist on NOC from KIADB for phodi.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of 5 acres of land in Sy.No.1 of M.Satyawara Village, Sulibele Hobli, Hoskote Taluk, Bangalore Rural District, ...