Search Results for "bootleggers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "bootleggers"

310 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 310 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Violation of Section 3(2) Proviso — Initial Detention Cannot Exceed Six Months. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act mandates an initial detention period of only six months, and a 12-month initial order is illegal.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Himanshu Roy, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, on 30 July 2022, confirmed by the State of Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

26 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Link Between Bootlegging and Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority must consider the detenu's bail status and establish a clear nexus between the alleged activities and public order, which was absent in this case.

12 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Anil Preetam Kumbhar, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune on 6 April 2018 under the Maharashtra Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents — Failure to Furnish In-Camera Statements and Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

31 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Hanuman Rajaram Mhatre, was detained under an order dated 6th September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane, under Sectio...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Karnataka Act for Twelve Months in First Instance. Detention Order Held Illegal as Contravening Proviso to Section 3(2) and Supreme Court Precedent in Cherukuri Mani; Detenu Ordered Released.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Yallappa, a poor coolie living with his wife and children in Raichur, was detained under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. The court held that failure to supply grounds in Telugu, the only language known to the detenu, vitiated the detention order and ordered his release.

27 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Jayamma, wife of the detenu Giddappa @ Lambu Giddappa, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order for Violation of Article 22(5) in Habeas Corpus Petition. Detenu's Right to Make Representation in Language Understood by Him Upheld, Detention Order Set Aside.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha Deepak Shintre, wife of the detenu Deepak Shivaji Shintre, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution Violated as Grounds of Detention Were Not Communicated and Relevant Documents Were Not Supplied.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Smt. Surekha Deepak Shintre, wife of the detenu Deepak Shivaji Shintre, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

25 Jun 2012

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Dangerous Person. Detention Order Based on Past Criminal Activities and In-Camera Statements Upheld as Valid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

21 Oct 2010

The petitioner, brother of the detenue Surendra @ Surya Daulat Desai, challenged a detention order dated 15th March 2010 issued by the Commissioner of...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)