Search Results for "bonus marks"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "bonus marks"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Prabodhak Recruitment Rules Amidst Discrimination Claims. Age Relaxation and Bonus Marks for Teaching Experience Deemed Constitutional, Appeals Dismissed

8 Jul 2024

A batch of 47 appeals before the Supreme Court of India, originating from judgments by the Rajasthan High Court. These appeals pertain to the recruitm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reservation for In-service Candidates in Postgraduate Medical Courses — State Government's Policy of Granting Weightage to In-service Candidates for 50% of Seats in Government Medical Colleges Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14 or 16 of the Constitution.

29 Jul 2016

The petitioners, who were candidates for admission to postgraduate medical courses in Maharashtra, challenged the State Government's policy of grantin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Prospective Overruling in Bonus Marks Case for Teacher Appointments in Rajasthan. The Court held that only writ petitioners who moved the High Court before November 18, 1999, are entitled to relief, and appointments made before that date are saved.

30 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from conflicting decisions of the Rajasthan High Court regarding the interpretation of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union and State in Consumer Protection Rules Challenge, Reversing High Court's Striking Down of Qualification and Procedure Provisions. Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9) of Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office, resignation and removal of President and Members of State Commission and District Commission) Rules, 2020 Found Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, as They Provide Sufficient Guidelines for Appointments to Consumer Commissions.

3 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Union of India, and State of Maharashtra against a common judgment and order ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCLT Order Dismissing Insolvency Petition and Directs Arbitration in Share Conversion Dispute - Dispute over conversion formula for preference shares under share subscription agreements held arbitrable, with no default established under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to ongoing negotiations and arbitration clause enforcement.

26 Mar 2021

The dispute originated from share subscription and shareholders' agreements dated 2007-2008 and supplemental agreements dated 2013-2017, where Kotak I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony and Lack of Homicidal Death Proof. Acquittal of Son, Wife, and Relatives for Murder of Deceased Trimbak Rasal Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

5 Dec 2017

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment dated 21.7.2001 passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Sessions Case N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder of Wife on Suspicion of Adultery — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Dying Declaration

11 Jun 2014

The appellant, Dhanaji Bhagwan Madne, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Vandana. The prosecution case was that the appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement Involving Gift of Shares and Reduction of Securities Premium Account. The court held that a scheme involving a gift of shares held by a company in another company to its shareholders and a reduction of the securities premium account by the book value of the investment is an arrangement under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and the reduction of the securities premium account does not require compliance with the procedure for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956 or Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Indian Seamless Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of a schem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Partnership Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Strong Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief. Court held that disputes regarding partnership accounts and alleged mismanagement must be resolved through arbitration, not by appointing receiver at interim stage.

22 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Minochar @ Minoo Aspandyar Irani, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)