Search Results for "bonus claim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "bonus claim"

353 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Customary Puja Bonus Despite Ex Gratia Declarations. Puja Bonus Recognized as Customary Payment When Unbroken Series, Long Period, Uniform Rate, and Paid in Loss Years, Even if Employer Previously Labeled it Ex Gratia.

7 May 1959

The dispute arose between Graham Trading Co. (India) Ltd., the employer, and its workmen regarding the payment of puja bonus for the year 1953. The co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Bonus Award by Limiting Depreciation Deduction in Surplus Calculation. Depreciation Admissible Under Income-tax Act Cannot Be Fully Claimed as Prior Charge; Abnormal Additions Like Initial and Additional Depreciation Not Fair to Workmen.

5 Nov 1957

The case arose from an industrial dispute between Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. and their workmen concerning payment of bonus for the year 1950–51. The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Decision of Authority Under Payment of Wages Act in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Classification. Bonus Awarded by Industrial Court Not 'Wages' Under Section 2(vi) as It Is Not Remuneration Payable Under Contract of Employment.

19 Mar 1958

The Supreme Court of India considered whether a bonus awarded by the Industrial Court, Bombay, to the operatives of Tata Mills Ltd. constituted 'wages...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope Limited to Existing Adjudicated Rights. The court held that the Labour Court cannot decide new claims for benefits not awarded in the original reinstatement order, as Section 33(C)(2) is only for computation of pre-existing rights.

17 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Smt. Neeta S. Pathak, was a workman who had been reinstated with back wages by an order dated 10th April 1991. Subsequently, she filed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition in Bonus Dispute Under Amended Section 12 of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that denial of bonus based on Rs.3,500 salary limit constitutes an unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

18 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Babasaheb Kedar Shetkari Sahakari Sut Girni, a cooperative spinning mill, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court, N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Evidence on Income. Claimant failed to prove permanent disability and loss of earning capacity, leading to reduction of award from Rs. 1,23,000 to Rs. 80,000 with interest at 6% p.a.

22 Dec 2018

The case involves a motor accident claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The claimant, Parvez Framroz Billimoria, was injured on 17...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Calculation. Court holds that Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be used to adjudicate disputed claims requiring determination of entitlement, and that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by computing bonus amounts without a prior adjudication of rights.

17 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Pawan Hans Limited challenging an order dated 27 June 2022 passed by the Authority under Sectio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Company's Appeal Against Industrial Tribunal Award – Modifies Gratuity Scheme and Applies Calcutta Medical Scheme; Bonus Remanded. Dispute Over Medical Benefits and Gratuity for Workmen in Madras Region Resolved by Applying Established Principles from Prior Decisions.

17 Oct 1969

The case originated from an industrial dispute between Remington Rand of India Limited and its workmen in the Madras region over demands for revision ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim with Weekly Holidays Counted as Worked Days and Interest for Delayed Payment under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employee entitled to inclusion of weekly holidays for 240-day eligibility, additional gratuity on retrospective pay revision, and interest at 10% per annum from date of superannuation.

11 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Baban S/o Rama Khakale, a retired employee of the Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the ju...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Corrected to 13 Based on Deceased's Age. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation of Rs.5,13,000/- with interest at 6% per annum.

13 Dec 2013

The appeal was filed by the claimants, the wife and children of the deceased Honnashamaiah, against the judgment and award dated 23rd September 2009 p...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)