Search Results for "bonafide mistake"

234 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 234 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Bonafide Requirement of Landlord Upheld. Tenant's Claim of Availability of Alternate Premises Rejected as Landlord Cannot Be Compelled to Use Residential Premises for Commercial Purpose Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendant-tenant (Parshuram Chunilal Kanojiya) challenging the eviction decree passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Student's Petition Against University's Retrospective Ineligibility Determination for B.Com (Financial Markets) Course. University's communication declaring student ineligible after 2.5 years of admission quashed as arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, a student, was admitted to the F.Y. B.Com (Financial Markets) course at Respondent No.6 College in the academic year 2020-2021 based o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Rejecting Condonation of 856-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Against Decree on Admission. Petitioner's Withdrawal of Timely Appeal and Subsequent Delay Not Justified as Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order dated 9 November 2022 passed by the Debt R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Remand Order in Rent Control Matter. Landlord Held Ineligible for Permission Under Clause 13(3)(vi) of C.P. and Berar Letting of Premises and Rent Control Order, 1949 Due to Availability of Other Suitable Accommodation.

The petitioner, Purushottam Ramlal Shukla, is the landlord of premises at Dharampeth, Nagpur, comprising two rooms admeasuring 22 ft. x 33 ft. let out...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial and first appellate court decrees regarding declaration of title and injunction, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The case is a Regular Second Appeal (RSA No.1858/2012) filed by the appellants (plaintiffs in the original suit) against the respondents (defendants) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Parents of 18-year-old who fell from train entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 despite absence of ticket.

The appellants, parents of deceased Prasad Narshima Purohit, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.4,00...