Search Results for "bogus contractor"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "bogus contractor"

55 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Gratuity Orders Against IIT Bombay in Contract Labour Case — Principal Employer Liable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. IIT Bombay held liable for gratuity of contract labourers despite absence of direct employer-employee relationship, as the definition of 'employer' under Section 2(f) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 includes the person who has ultimate control over the affairs of the establishment.

4 Oct 2024

The Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay (IIT Bombay) filed three writ petitions challenging orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Autho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

20 Aug 2024

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Absorption Order in Favor of Municipal Corporation in Contract Labour Dispute — Industrial Court's Direction to Absorb Contract Workers Without Proper Adjudication of Employer-Employee Relationship Set Aside.

18 Oct 2023

The Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation filed a writ petition challenging an Award dated 12 January 2017 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane. The...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Principal Employer in Contract Labour Dispute — No Automatic Absorption Without Section 10 Notification or Sham Contract Finding. Contract Labourers Cannot Be Deemed Employees of Principal Employer Under CLRA Act Absent Prohibition Notification or Evidence of Sham Contract.

5 Dec 2022

The case involves an appeal by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (the principal employer) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which upheld ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

5 Jul 2019

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award Declaring Contract Labour as Direct Employees. Contracts for supply of labour found to be sham and bogus, workmen held entitled to direct employment with all benefits under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

6 Jun 2018

The petitioner, M/s Prabha Engineering Pvt. Ltd., an engineering company manufacturing automobile parts, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CGIT Award Holding Canteen Contract as Sham and Bogus, Directs Absorption of Canteen Workers as Direct Employees of Principal Employer. Contract Labour Arrangement Found to Be a Mere Facade with Principal Employer Exercising Complete Control Over Workers, Making Them Direct Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

26 Jul 2016

The petitioner, The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., a public company, challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1 (CGIT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Contract Labour Absorption Case. Contract between principal employer and contractor held not sham; canteen workers not entitled to absorption under Factories Act, 1948.

12 Aug 2014

The Goa M.R.F. Employees Union filed a writ petition challenging the award of the Industrial Tribunal of Goa, which held that the demand for absorptio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Workmen Seeking Absorption in Western Coalfields Limited — Canteen Workers Not Entitled to Direct Absorption as Contractor Was Not a Sham and Contract Labour Was Not Prohibited Under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1947.

5 Jan 2011

The petitioner, a trade union representing workmen of Taroda Opencast Mine of Western Coalfields Limited, challenged an award of the Central Governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Regularisation of Canteen Workers. Contract Labour System Upheld as Genuine, Not a Sham, and Workers Not Entitled to Direct Employment by Principal Employer.

31 Aug 2006

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by Contract Laghu Udyog Kamgar Union challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 19th March 2...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)