Search Results for "bogus agreement"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Bogus Purchases Case — Disallowance of 10% Purchases Set Aside. ITAT's finding that AO's order was not based on cogent evidence required full deletion of addition, not partial disallowance.

The case involves three Income Tax Appeals filed by the Assessee, Ashok Kumar Rungta, challenging the ITAT's order dated August 9, 2017, which upheld ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale in Favor of Flat Purchaser Against Developer and Subsequent Purchasers. Agreement for Sale dated 6th March 1980 declared valid and binding, subsequent agreement dated 4th April 1988 declared bogus and invalid.

The case involves a dispute over the specific performance of an agreement for sale of a flat. The flat purchaser, Dr. Arun Subrao Prabhu, entered into...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award in Shareholder Dispute. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The case involves two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by M/s. Goldstar Metal Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...