Search Results for "beverage"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Tax Classification Appeal -- 'Appellants Product' Held as Fruit Drink Under UPVAT Act -- Appellants Succeeds Against Commercial Tax Commissioner

The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by Appellants challenging the classification of their product under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Restaurant Owner in Legal Metrology Act Applicability Case. Service of Food and Beverages in Restaurant Held Not a Sale of Prepackaged Commodity Under Legal Metrology Act, 2009.

The petitioner, Mars Enterprises and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., operates a restaurant named 'Pizza by the Bay' in Mumbai. The restaurant provides food, be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals, Affirms Refund of Licence Fee and Differential Amount for Period of Unlawful Closure of Distillery Premises. Licensee Entitled to Refund When Premises Sealed Without Opportunity of Hearing, and Suspension Order Passed Without Show-Cause Notice.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the State of Bihar against a Patna High Court judgment directing refund of licence fee and differential amount ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Nescafe Premix as Coffee Under Entry 3 of Schedule C Part II of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Product 'Coffee and Instant Drinks Nescafe Premix' Held Not Covered by Entry 18(2) (Beverages) Based on Common Parlance Test and Predominant Ingredient.

The case involves a reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a dispute between the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Breach of Contract Dispute — Payment Direction Inconsistent with Findings. Court holds that an arbitral tribunal cannot grant relief contrary to its own findings on merits, applying Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hersheys India Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Charges Against Hotel Managing Director and General Manager in Guest Fall Case — No Criminal Negligence Established. Vicarious Liability Not Attracted Under Sections 336/338 IPC and Section 4 COTPA Without Specific Allegations of Active Role.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Shiv Kumar Jatia (accused No.2, Managing Director) and Aseem Kapoor (accused No.4, General Manager) aga...