Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Restaurant Owner in Legal Metrology Act Applicability Case. Service of Food and Beverages in Restaurant Held Not a Sale of Prepackaged Commodity Under Legal Metrology Act, 2009.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mars Enterprises and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., operates a restaurant named 'Pizza by the Bay' in Mumbai. The restaurant provides food, beverages, and other amenities to its guests. On 16 June 2017, Respondent No.3, a Legal Metrology Inspector, conducted a surprise inspection and alleged that the restaurant had sold a bottle of Fanta with a printed MRP of Rs.38 for a total price of Rs.244, thereby contravening the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. A notice dated 3 July 2017 was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that the Legal Metrology Act and rules are not applicable to the service of food and beverages at its restaurant, and to quash the notice and seizure receipt. The court framed the issue of whether the Act applies to restaurant services. The petitioner argued that it does not sell prepackaged commodities but only serves food and beverages as part of its service. The respondent contended that the sale of a soft drink bottle constitutes a sale of a prepackaged commodity. The court analyzed the definitions under the Act, particularly 'prepackaged commodity', and held that the Act applies only to sale of prepackaged commodities intended for retail sale. Since the restaurant serves food and beverages as a service, the transaction is not a sale of goods. The court quashed the notice and seizure receipt, ruling that the Legal Metrology Act does not apply to restaurant services.

Headnote

A) Legal Metrology - Applicability to Restaurants - Service vs. Sale - Legal Metrology Act, 2009, Sections 2, 3, 18, 36 - The court considered whether the Act applies to restaurants serving food and beverages. It held that the Act applies only to sale of prepackaged commodities and not to service of food and beverages in a restaurant, as the transaction is a service and not a sale of goods. The notice and seizure were quashed. (Paras 2-10)

B) Legal Metrology - Prepackaged Commodity - Definition - Legal Metrology Act, 2009, Section 2(l) - The court examined the definition of 'prepackaged commodity' and held that a soft drink served in a restaurant is not a prepackaged commodity as it is not intended for retail sale but for consumption on premises. (Paras 4-8)

C) Legal Metrology - Maximum Retail Price - Applicability - Legal Metrology Act, 2009, Section 18 - The court held that the requirement to sell at MRP applies only to sale of prepackaged commodities and not to items served as part of restaurant service. Charging above MRP for a soft drink served in a restaurant does not contravene the Act. (Paras 5-9)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and the rules framed thereunder are applicable to the service of food and beverages at a restaurant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, declaring that the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and rules are not applicable to the service of food and beverages at the petitioner's restaurant. The notice dated 03/07/2017 and seizure receipt dated 16/06/2017 were quashed and set aside.

Law Points

  • Legal Metrology Act
  • 2009 applies only to sale of prepackaged commodities
  • not to service of food and beverages in restaurants
  • Service of food and beverages is a service
  • not a sale of goods
  • MRP restrictions under Legal Metrology Act do not apply to items served as part of restaurant service
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (08) 128

WRIT PETITION NO.2548 OF 2017

2018-08-13

RANJIT MORE, SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI

Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar with Mr. Sameer Pandit and Ms Sarrah Khambati I/b. M/s. Wadia Ghandy and Co. for the Petitioner, Mr. Kedar Dighe, AGP for the RespondentsState

Mars Enterprises and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking declaration that Legal Metrology Act, 2009 does not apply to restaurant services and to quash notice and seizure.

Remedy Sought

Declaration that Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and rules are not applicable to service of food and beverages at petitioner's restaurant; quashing of notice dated 03/07/2017 and seizure receipt dated 16/06/2017.

Filing Reason

Respondent no.3 issued notice alleging sale of Fanta bottle above MRP, contravening Legal Metrology Act.

Issues

Whether the provisions of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and rules are applicable to the service of food and beverages at a restaurant.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that it does not sell prepackaged commodities but only serves food and beverages as part of its service, hence Act not applicable. Respondent argued that sale of soft drink bottle constitutes sale of prepackaged commodity, thus Act applies.

Ratio Decidendi

The Legal Metrology Act, 2009 applies only to sale of prepackaged commodities and not to service of food and beverages in a restaurant, as the transaction is a service and not a sale of goods.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking declaration that the provisions of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and rules framed thereunder are not applicable to the services of food and beverages at the petitioner's restaurant. The court held that the Act applies only to sale of prepackaged commodities and not to service of food and beverages in a restaurant.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Writ Petition No.2548 of 2017 in Bombay High Court seeking declaration and quashing of notice and seizure. Rule was issued and matter taken up for final hearing by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Legal Metrology Act, 2009: 2, 3, 18, 36
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case in Trademark Dispute Due to Civil Nature of Dispute and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of deceptive similarity in tea packaging held to be primarily a civil trademark infringement matter, not warranting c...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Demolition of Illegal Construction in Streamlet Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965. Court Directs Municipal Council to Act Independently of Tahsildar's Letter and Enforce Law Against Unauthor...