Search Results for "beneficiated coal"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Royalty on Run-of-Mine Coal for Period Prior to Insertion of Rule 64B and 64C in Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Processed or Beneficiated Coal Attracts Royalty After Effective Date of Notification Dated 25th September, 2000.

The dispute involved multiple appeals before the Supreme Court arising out of conflicting interpretations of the stage at which royalty becomes payabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NGT Directions for Remedial Measures in Thermal Power Plants for Environmental Compliance. Directions for installation of air pollution control devices and scientific disposal of fly ash under Environment Protection Act, 1986 upheld.

The case involves appeals by several thermal power plants (TPPs) against an order of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 18.01.2022. The NGT had i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-Qualification Criteria in Mining Tender for Being Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Condition requiring prior experience in coal washery operation within a specified region held to be discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Bhatia Coal Washeries Ltd., challenged the pre-qualification criteria of Tender No. MSMC/MINING/2019/07 dated 16-8-2019 issued by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions in Coal Supply Contract Dispute — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction. Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills Challenged, but Court Holds Alternative Remedy of Arbitration Available.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...