Search Results for "banned organization"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Alleged Maoist Members in UAP Act Case — Insufficient Evidence of Terrorist Activity. Mere Membership of Banned Organization Without Active Participation Does Not Attract Stringent Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

The judgment concerns two bail applications filed by Jyoti Babasaheb Chorge (Accused No.4) and Sushma Hemant Ramtekke (Accused No.2) in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to MCOCA Accused in Ahmedabad Bomb Blasts Case Due to Parity with Co-Accused and Long Incarceration Without Trial. Parity with co-accused who were granted bail and prolonged detention without trial justified bail under MCOCA.

The applicant, Yasir Sayyed Anis Sayyed @ Hujefa, was accused no.13 in MCOC Special Case No.4 of 2009 pending before the Special Court under the MCOC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Murder Case on Grounds of Parity and Delay in Trial. Appellants Accused of Murder Under Section 302 IPC and Offences Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Granted Bail as Co-Accused Already Released.

The appellants, accused Nos. 1 and 4, filed a criminal appeal under Section 21(4) of the NIA Act challenging the order dated 21.04.2021 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MCOCA Case Due to Parity with Co-Accused and Delay in Trial. Applicant, in custody since 2008, granted bail as trial not commenced and case similar to co-accused who was already bailed.

The applicant, Afroz Firoz Mujawar @ Dastagir, was accused No. 19 in MCOC Act Special Case No. 4 of 2009 pending before the Special Court under the MC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Entry Ban Against Social Activist in Goa — Violation of Fundamental Rights Under Article 19(1)(d) and (e) of Constitution. Ban Order Passed Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing and Without Recording Subjective Satisfaction as Required Under Section 144 CrPC.

The petitioner, Pramod Mutalik, the leader of Sri Ram Sene, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition of SDPI Against Sealing of Party Offices — Mandamus Issued for Removal of Seals. Political Party's Right to Function Upheld as Sealing Without UAPA Attachment Order is Illegal.

The petitioner, Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), a political party registered under the Representation of the People Act, 1951, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Ban Order Against Contractor in ONGC Project Delay Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Internal Enquiry Report Not Shared With Contractor Before Imposing Business Ban, Rendering Order Arbitrary and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Sarku Engineering Services SDN BHD, a Malaysian company, challenged an order dated 4 January 2016 issued by respondent No.2, Oil and N...