Search Results for "bank account seizure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "bank account seizure"

167 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 167 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

High Court Quashes GST Seizure Orders and Directs Release of Cash with Interest in Writ Petition. Seizure of INR 1 Crore Held Illegal as Cash Not Covered Under Section 67(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Due to Lack of 'Reasons to Believe' and Procedural Non-Compliance.

10 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Petitioner, a proprietor registered under the GST Act, challenging two seizure orders dated 27th and 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Applications Challenging Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 102 Cr.P.C. — Police Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account Without Specific Link to Suspected Offence. The court held that Section 102 Cr.P.C. requires a nexus between the property seized and the alleged crime, and freezing without such nexus is illegal.

18 Mar 2011

The case involved a reference to a larger bench on the interpretation of Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) concerning the pow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defreezing of Bank Accounts in Cheque-Bouncing Case — No Prima Facie Case for Freezing Under Section 102 CrPC. Court held that freezing of accounts under Section 102 CrPC is not permissible for investigation of cheque-bouncing offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the offence is non-cognizable and the bank is not a third party.

30 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Manish Khandelwal, Sunil Khandelwal, and B.M. Financial Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank and Sugar Factory's Petitions Challenging Auction of Cooperative Sugar Factory Assets. Held that the Bank as a secured creditor has a paramount charge over the property and the auction sale cannot be set aside after confirmation and payment.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute over the auction sale of assets of Doulat Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory, by the Kolh...

High Court

Search Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Unveiling the Controversy Surrounding the Unconstitutional Search and Seizure of Cash, Jewelry, and Documents by Revenue Authorities

10 May 2024

Presents two petitions challenging a search action conducted under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioners, including a private limit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Removal of Bank Officer in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice. Non-Supply of Documents and Enquiry Report, and Bias by Enquiry Officer Lead to Setting Aside of Removal Order Under Service Law.

7 Sep 2011

The petitioner, Balaji Digambarrao Kotgire, was appointed as a Clerk-cum-Cashier in the Oriental Bank of Commerce on 7th July 1979. He was later promo...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)