Search Results for "bailiff direction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "bailiff direction"

46 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 46 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Petition Challenging Execution Orders in Eviction Decree — Decree Holders Entitled to Possession After 15 Years of Litigation Up to Supreme Court.

5 Dec 2018

The case involves a dispute over execution of a decree for possession of an open piece of land admeasuring 1280 square feet out of Nazul Plot No. 9 in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Substituted Service Upheld Under Order 5 Rule 20 CPC. Exparte Decree Restored as Tenant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance.

7 Jun 2011

The case involves a landlord-tenant dispute over a room in Mumbai. The original petitioner (landlord) filed a suit for possession against the original...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court Order in Execution Proceedings for Overreaching Earlier Decree — Bailiff Directed to Execute Decree as Per Original Terms Without Deviation. The court held that the executing court cannot modify the decree or add conditions not found in the decree, and the impugned order was set aside under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

14 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Prabhakar Ramchandra Desai and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Want of Prosecution Due to Non-Service of Defendants — Court Holds That Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 5 CPC Requires Willful Default or Negligence, Not Mere Failure to Serve. The court restored the suit, emphasizing that the plaintiffs had made efforts to serve the defendants and had filed a Chamber Summons for substituted service, which was pending.

29 Jan 2018

The appellants, M/s. Jain Developers and others, filed Suit No. 2808 of 2008 in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that there was a valid and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Discrepancies in Evidence. Court upholds trial court's finding that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

9 Jul 2014

The case involves a first appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Naziruddin Khan (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs), against the dismis...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Held That the Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Was Not Served on the Judgment Debtor and the Communication Order Was Not a Mandatory Direction, Thus No Willful Disobedience Established.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, A. Dakshnamoorthy, as power agent of his son D. Chandrasekaran, filed two contempt petitions. The first (Cont.P.No.1723/2025) was agai...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Does Not Create a Charge on Property and That Sub Registrars Are Not Bound by Such Orders Unless Property Is Attached.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, D. Chandrasekaran, represented by his power agent A. Dakshnamoorthy, filed two contempt petitions. The first, Cont.P.No.1723 of 2025, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three appeals filed by the defendants (Smt. Malti Kapadia, Hemant Kapadia, and Vijaysingh Kapadia) against an order of the City Civi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Petition in Eviction Decree Execution — Division Bench of Small Causes Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Remanding Matter for Proposal to Remove Structure. The decree had attained finality up to the Supreme Court, and the executing court's order directing restoration of vacant possession was proper; the revisional court's interference was unwarranted.

10 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Mrs. Vranda G. Pai, is the decree holder in an eviction decree dated 2nd December 2006, which had attained finality up to the Supreme ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)