Search Results for "bail orders non-consideration"

11 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Bail Order Before Detaining Authority. The court held that the bail order was a vital document and its non-consideration vitiated the subjective satisfaction under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detinue, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the detention order dated 17th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Anticipatory Bail Granted Without Reasons in Cooperative Society Misappropriation Case. Sessions Court Order Set Aside Under Section 482 CrPC for Non-Application of Mind in Granting Pre-Arrest Bail to Chairman Accused of Defalcation of Rs.7 Crores and 7 Kg Gold.

The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur took suo motu cognizance of an order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, granting anticipatory bail ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Anticipatory Bail Granted Without Notice to State in Abetment of Suicide Case. Ex-parte Interim Bail Under Section 438 CrPC Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice.

The applicant, Ashok Jairam Bhojane, the original first informant, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Lack of Proximity and Non-Application of Mind. Detention orders set aside as the detenus were not directly involved in smuggling and the detaining authority failed to consider less drastic alternatives.

The Bombay High Court, by a judgment dated 24 January 2014, allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...