Search Results for "backdated appointments"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "backdated appointments"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Interchange of Approval and Appointment of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools — Violation of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules. The Court held that approval must precede appointment and cannot be backdated, quashing the Education Officer's orders.

17 Jun 2026

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by assistant teachers and a school management challenging the action of the Education Officer (Primary)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Assistant Professor for Lack of Non-Creamy Layer Certificate at Interview. Court Holds That Production of Certificate After Interview Is a Curable Irregularity, Not a Fatal Defect, and That Petitioner Cannot Seek Appointment Based on Higher Marks Alone.

2 Jul 2024

The petitioner, an OBC candidate, challenged the selection of respondent No.5 as Assistant Professor, alleging that respondent No.5 did not possess a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions in Madrasa Teacher Appointment Case Due to Lack of Explicit Directions for Salary Release. Contempt Jurisdiction Limited to Four Corners of Judgment; Verification of Qualifications and Statutory Conditions Required Under West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act, 2008.

2 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with multiple contempt petitions alleging willful violation of its earlier judgment in Shaikh Md. Rafique v. Managing Committe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Award Directing Permanent Absorption of 2700 Sweepers and Loaders Engaged in Solid Waste Management. The Case Involves Determination Whether Workers Who Performed Essential Statutory Duties for Over 240 Days Are Entitled to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Being Engaged Through Intermediaries.

22 Dec 2016

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation, established under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Approval of Shikshan Sevak Appointments in Private School for Violating MEPS Act Recruitment Procedure. Appointments Made Without Proper Advertisement and in Contravention of Government Resolution and Roster Requirements Were Held Invalid.

23 Aug 2016

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, adjudicated a writ petition filed by Datta Education Society, Talne, through its President, challenging the a...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Deputy Director's Approval of Teacher Appointments in Private School. Petition Alleges Non-Compliance with Section 5, Rule 9 of MEPS Act and Government Resolution Dated 06.02.2012.

23 Aug 2016

The writ petition challenged the order of Deputy Director of Education confirming the approval of appointments of two Shikshan Sevak teachers in a sch...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeals Challenging Dismissal of Management's Writ Petition in Employee Seniority Dispute. The Appeals Were Admitted and Heard Finally With Consent of Parties.

26 Feb 2014

The Letters Patent Appeals arose from the dismissal of a writ petition by a Single Judge. The appellant management, an educational institution managin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Found Under Section 100 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of title and pe...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)