Search Results for "atomic energy regulatory board"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "atomic energy regulatory board"

24 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Relocation of BARC Nuclear Reactor Due to Tsunami and Fault Line Concerns. Court Holds No Credible Scientific Evidence of Imminent Danger to Nuclear Installation from Geological Fault Line or Tsunami.

28 Apr 2005

The Bombay High Court dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Citizens For A Just Society, a social organization founded by Dr. Usha Meh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Institutionalizes Central Empowered Committee as Permanent Statutory Body Under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The Court approved a notification constituting the CEC for monitoring compliance of environmental orders and directed that dissenting opinions be reported to ensure transparency.

31 Jan 2024

The judgment arises from the Supreme Court's ongoing supervision in the T.N. Godavarman case concerning environmental protection. The Central Empowere...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows State Appeal Against NGT Order on PUC Certificates — Holds That NGT Cannot Direct Fuel Bans or Impose Monetary Deposits for Compliance. The Court ruled that the NGT exceeded its jurisdiction under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, by directing fuel supply denial and imposing a Rs. 25 crore deposit, as such powers are not conferred by the Act.

28 Aug 2020

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against an order of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) Central Zonal Bench, Bhopal, dated 21 April 2015, which dir...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Public Sector Refinery Owner's Challenge to Construction Permissions in Security Prohibited Zone. Grant of Commencement Certificate for Residential Building Within 500 Meters of Category 'A' Vital Installation Found Contrary to Official Secrets Act, 1923, DCR, and Circulars Issued by Ministry of Home Affairs.

25 Apr 2019

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a government company operating a refinery at Mahul in Mumbai, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court ch...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

1 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

24 Sep 2024

The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)