Search Results for "article 120"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "article 120"

1772 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1772 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Criminal Complaint for Conspiracy to Illegally Acquire Foreign Exchange. Majority Held that Section 21(1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 Does Not Exclude Applicability of Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code for Continuing Conspiracy.

14 Oct 1969

The Rayala Corporation (P) Ltd. manufactured Halda typewriters in India using materials imported from Sweden. Appellant no.1, Lennart Schussler, a Swe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Striking Off Written Statements in Commercial Suit — Time Limit of 120 Days Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC and Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

28 Apr 2026

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by defendants in a commercial suit instituted by Tata Steel Ltd. (respondent) for recovery of amount...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Amendment to CPC Fixing 120-Day Limit for Written Statement; Challenge to Provisions Curtailing Judicial Discretion and Inherent Powers. The Amendment, Introduced by State Legislature, Allegedly Overrides Supreme Court Ruling and Violates Articles 14 and 141 of the Constitution.

28 Jul 2026

The High Court of Karnataka entertained two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutional validi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Summary Court Martial Case Due to Lack of Immediate Action Requirement. The Court held that the convening of a Summary Court Martial after a nine-month delay was contrary to Section 120 of the Army Act, 1950, and modified the punishment to discharge upon completion of fifteen years of service for pension eligibility.

8 Jul 2019

The appellant, Randhir Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army on 29 October 1996 and was posted as Acting Lance Dafadar. On 11 August 2007, while on d...

High Court

High Court Holds in Review Petition that CPC Amendments under Commercial Courts Act Do Not Apply to Commercial Disputes Below Specified Value. The 120‑day limit for written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 of CPC, 1908 as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is inapplicable to suits where the Specified Value is below Rs. 3 lakhs, even if the suit is before the Commercial Division under the proviso to Section 7.

1 Jun 2019

The dispute arose in a commercial suit where the Plaintiff had determined the Specified Value at Rs. 20,000, which was below the threshold of Rs. 3 la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Petition in Excise Duty Evasion Case — No Prima Facie Case for Discharge Established. Petitioner, a German national and director of a distillery, failed to show that the allegations under IPC and PC Act were groundless, as the charge sheet and material disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Rakesh Rastogi, a German national and director of M/s. Krimpy Distillery, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Cons...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Induction of Non-Legislator Ministers with Less Than Six Months Remaining in Assembly Term. Conformity of Such Induction with Article 164(4) of the Constitution of India Questioned.

13 Sep 2019

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Vijay Namdeorao Wadettiwar (a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Trust's Eviction Petition Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act — Legal Heirs Not Entitled to Protection After Death of Original Tenant. The court held that Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958, does not protect legal heirs of a deceased tenant, and the eviction order was restored.

23 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Vidarbha Maharogi Seva Mandal, a public trust, filed an application under Section 120(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural L...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Examines Constitutional Validity of Ordinance Extending Term of Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti Office Bearers. Petitioners Contend That Ordinance Promulgated Under Article 213 for Assembly Elections Lacks Emergent Circumstances and Infringes Constitutional Mandates.

17 Oct 2019

These writ petitions were filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners, ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Limitation for Suit Against Port Trust Under Section 120 of Major Port Trusts Act, 1963. Plaintiffs' Notice Under Section 120 Sent More Than Five Years After Lease Expiry and Accrual of Cause of Action.

4 Jul 2013

The suit was instituted by Kewal Kishan Aggarwal and others against the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai seeking renewal of seven leases that e...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)