Search Results for "arbitrator fees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "arbitrator fees"

270 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

1 Apr 2026

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Render Award and Excessive Fees — Substitute Arbitrator Appointed Under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that failure to render award within reasonable time and demanding excessive fees constitute failure to act under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Parekh Industries Limited, filed a petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking terminatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.

30 Nov 2017

The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Arbitral Award Due to Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice — Leave and Licence Agreement Dispute. The court held that the arbitrator failed to ensure proper service of notice on the petitioner, thereby denying it a fair opportunity to present its case under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ex-parte arbitral...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Pass Award Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator After Original Arbitrator Failed to Conclude Proceedings Despite Multiple Extensions.

16 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Madhav Structural Engineers Limited, filed a petition under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking term...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Upholds Award on Most Claims but Sets Aside Interest Rate. Dispute arose from delays in crude distribution system project; court held that arbitrator's findings on delay and damages were not perverse but interest rate of 18% was excessive and reduced to 9%.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 30 June 2005 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Setting Aside Part of Arbitral Award for Being Contrary to Public Policy. Court holds that arbitrator cannot award interest on interest (compound interest) unless specifically agreed, and that claims barred by limitation cannot be awarded.

29 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyagor, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Guarantee Enforcement Case. Personal Guarantors Held Liable Despite Principal Borrower's Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Section 14 of IBC.

17 Feb 2015

The petitioners, Jamboo Kumar Jain and Praful Kumar Jain, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)