Search Results for "apprenticeship period"

29 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 29 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Railway Employee's Petition for Inclusion of Apprenticeship Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. Gap of 45 Days Between Completion of Apprenticeship and Regular Posting Breaks Continuity, Disentitling Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, a retired Railway employee, was appointed as an Apprentice Telecom Inspector on 23/12/1964 and completed his two-year apprenticeship o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Writ Petitions on Naval Dockyard Employee Grading and Benefits. Naval Dockyard Mumbai employees' plea for DM 6/85 benefits rejected, court upholds validity of later DTMs due to delay and procedural grounds.

Two writ petitions were filed against an order by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which dismissed applications by employees of the Naval Do...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Relaxation of Certificate Requirement in Technician Grade-2 Recruitment. Relaxation of eligibility condition without advertisement mention is impermissible, but first relaxation upheld in larger public interest due to certificate issuance delays.

The appeals arose from the selection and appointment to the post of Technician Grade-2 (Apprenticeship Electrical) in the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Declares Plaintiff Owner of Copyright in Drawings Developed Under Contract for Valuable Consideration. Payment of Rs.2,87,500/- for Development of Drug Powder Inhaler Transfers Copyright Ownership Under Section 17 of Copyright Act, 1957.

The plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, a pharmaceutical company, sought to develop a Drug Powder Inhaler (DPI) device for asthma medications...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Prior Use and Reputation. Oral Agreement Claim Fails as Plaintiffs Cannot Establish Exclusive Rights Over 'Puranmal' Mark and Chef Logo.

The plaintiffs, Abhay Agarwal, Ajay Agarwal, and Puranmal Restaurant, a partnership firm based in Dubai, filed a suit against Puranmal Goods Private L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employee Terminated Without Notice in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an award of the ...