Search Results for "apprentice development officer"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition by Apprentices Seeking Absorption as Regular Officers Under Apprentices Act, 1961. No Automatic Right to Absorption Exists Under Section 22(1) of the Act, and Employer Retains Discretion in Recruitment, with Writ Jurisdiction Limited to Policy Enforcement.

The petitioners, who were appointed as Graduate Apprentice Trainees by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (HPCL) in 2016-2017, filed a writ petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Apprentice Employees in Zilla Parishad — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of apprentices without inquiry or notice held illegal as they were 'workmen' under the Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by 21 individuals who were engaged as apprentices by the Zilla Parishad, Wardha, under the Appre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Gram Panchayat Employee Challenging Dismissal for Indecent Behaviour. Termination Order Upheld as Gram Panchayat Had Power to Dismiss Under Section 61(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Procedure of Natural Justice Was Followed.

The petitioner, Ashok Govindrao Sardar, was appointed as a Water Supply employee of Gram Panchayat Pimpalkhuta on 31 January 1986. On 12 December 2012...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal of Development Officer in LIC Termination Case for Non-Compliance with Performance Benchmarks. Confirmation of Appointment Does Not Confer Immunity from Termination Under LIC Staff Regulations.

The appellant, Mahesh Harikrishna Vyas, was appointed as an Apprentice Development Officer with the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) on 10.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Employee for Unauthorized Occupation of Railway Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Title or Permission for Construction, Leading to Dismissal of Writ Petition.

The petitioner, B.S. Rath, joined Western Railway as an Apprentice on 15th February 1965 and later became a Senior Motorman. He was charged with unaut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for Apprentice Development Officers of LIC. Apprenticeship Training Scheme under Section 18 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 does not create employer-employee relationship or right to absorption.

The petitioners, a group of individuals who were engaged as apprentice development officers by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under a t...