Search Results for "appeal scope"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "appeal scope"

8468 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8468 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Hearing at Admission Stage of Victim's Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. — No Leave Required, Summary Dismissal Permissible After Hearing. The court held that the appeal by a victim against acquittal is a matter of right and the procedure under Section 384 Cr.P.C. applies, allowing summary dismissal after hearing.

1 Feb 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of hearing at the admission stage of an appeal filed by a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies Scope of Hearing at Admission Stage of Victim's Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. — No Leave Required, Summary Dismissal Permissible After Hearing. The court held that the hearing at admission stage is not a full-fledged hearing but an opportunity to show sufficient ground for interference under Section 384 Cr.P.C.

1 Feb 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of hearing at the admission stage of an appeal filed by a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Co-ordinate Bench on Scope of Appeal Under Section 58 RERA, Holding That Appeals Lie Only on Substantial Questions of Law. The Court interpreted Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 to restrict appeals to the High Court to grounds specified in Section 100 CPC, i.e., substantial questions of law, and not questions of fact.

6 Mar 2023

The case involved two writ petitions filed by Man Global Ltd against Ram Prakash Joukani and Bharat Prakash Joukani, arising from orders of the Real E...

High Court

Bombay High Court Clarifies That Appeal Under Section 72(4) of Bombay Public Trusts Act is a Regular Appeal Not Subject to Section 100 CPC Limitations. Full Bench Holds That Such Appeal Permits Full Rehearing on Both Facts and Law, Overruling Earlier Division Bench View That It is a Second Appeal Requiring Substantial Questions of Law.

1 Apr 2016

The dispute originated from two rival Change Reports filed under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, concerning the management committee of a public t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Holds That Letters Patent Appeal Is Maintainable Against Single Judge Decision in Writ Petition Under Articles 226/227 of Constitution — Maintainability Depends on Nature of Order, Not Label of Jurisdiction Invoked. The Court Emphasized Liberal Construction of Clause 15 of Letters Patent to Remedy Injustice.

17 Mar 2011

This judgment of a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court addresses the recurring question of whether a Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 15 of the Lett...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal on Vested Right of Appeal in Central Excise Case — Amended Pre-deposit Requirement Not Applicable to Appeals Where Lis Arose Prior to Amendment. The court held that the right of appeal is a vested right and the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, effective from 6 August 2014, cannot be applied retrospectively to fetter that right.

25 Jul 2016

The appellant, Nimbus Communications Limited, entered into an agreement and was subjected to a service tax demand. The appellant filed an appeal befor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Partner in Joint Decree for Goods Supplied, Holding That Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 4 CPC Is Maintainable Despite Non-Service on Co-Defendant. Joint Decree Against Two Partners Could Be Challenged by One Partner Alone as Ground of Liability Was Common, Following Karam Singh Sobti Precedent.

15 Apr 1969

The dispute arose from a suit filed by Firm Lalmandas Chhadammalal against the partnership firm Mohan Singh Ratan Lal, through its partners Mohan Sing...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Examines Whether Appeal is Barred by Res Judicata and Abatement in Suit for Specific Performance; Court Notes that Plaintiffs Did Not Appeal Decree in Companion Suit and Failed to Bring All Legal Heirs On Record.

20 Mar 2026

The appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 18.03.2000 passed by the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 176 of 1991 and Regular Civil Suit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refers Questions on Scope of Appellate Interference in Interim Injunction Orders to Larger Bench. Division Bench Noted Conflict Between Precedents on Whether Injunction Orders Are Discretionary or Prima Facie Adjudication, Impacting Appeal Scope Under Order 43 Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

28 Apr 2025

The Bombay High Court, constituted as a larger bench, was seized of a reference made by a Division Bench owing to irreconcilable conflict in precedent...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal Against Part Decree in Specific Performance Suit; Appellant Challenges Dismissal at Admission Stage Under Section 96 CPC. Scope of Section 96 CPC and Requirement of Full Hearing on Merits in Appeals Questioned; Trial Court Had Dismissed Specific Performance Claim for Lack of Readiness and Willingness but Ordered Refund of Advance.

3 Mar 2015

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell immovable property. The plaintiff (appellant) and defendant No.1 execute...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)