Search Results for "alighting"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "alighting"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Untoward Incident Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and the incident of falling from a train is an untoward incident, reversing the Tribunal's dismissal.

19 Apr 2024

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Jayamma, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, dated 2...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Bus Fire Caused by Negligence of KSRTC Driver. Claimant Entitled to Compensation as Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition on Grounds of Non-Joinder of Driver and Lack of Negligence Evidence.

4 Nov 2022

The appellant/claimant, Smt. Chandra Prabha P., filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for inj...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Alighting from Offside Due to Rush Not a Criminal Act. Held that falling from train due to own negligence is not a criminal act under Section 124A proviso (c) of Railways Act, 1989.

31 Jul 2019

The appellant, Rekha Suryvanshi, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries sustained while alighting...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Widow and Minor Daughters Entitled to Compensation for Death of Pedestrian Hit by Bus. Negligence of Bus Driver Established as Deceased Was Walking on Road After Alighting from Bus.

19 Mar 2015

The present appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 03.11.2009 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of the Motor Accident Claims Tr...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case. Deemed Bona Fide Passenger's Fall Due to Jerk is Untoward Incident Under Section 124A Railways Act, 1989.

27 Mar 2026

The Union of India appealed against the award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, which granted compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with 6% inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Self-Inflicted Injury Not Proved. Deceased was a bonafide passenger; failure to examine witnesses leads to inference of untoward incident under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

27 Jan 2026

The appeal was filed by the original applicants, Vasanti Parsottam Patel and Mrs. Urvashi Ravi Jugran, challenging the order dated 29 September 2014 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Death Due to Fall from Train, Holding It an 'Untoward Incident' Under Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration is strictly liable for compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, even if the passenger's own negligence contributed to the incident.

6 Jul 2017

The appellant, Shankar Narayan Rathod (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Gangabai), filed an appeal against the dismissal of his compensat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The sole eyewitness identification was not credible and circumstantial evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC.

19 Jul 2005

The appellant, Raju Willson Pawda @ Kalya Raju, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Babu Sampat Munnaswa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court uphold conviction of Accused in Murder Case Due to reliable Witness Testimony and sufficient Evidence for Unlawful Assembly. Appellants Conviction Under Sections 148 and 302/149 IPC confirmed

11 Mar 2026

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals filed by four accused persons convicted for the murder of Balkishan and sentenced to life imprisonment under ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)