Search Results for "age limit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "age limit"

818 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 818 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Police Recruitment Selection Process — No Merit in Allegations of Irregularities in Physical Endurance Test and Viva Voce. Court Held That Selection Process Was Conducted Fairly and in Accordance with Rules, and Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Malafides or Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

28 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Sushant Suresh Salvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the selection process for the p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Non-Cumulative Age Relaxation in Public Service Recruitment — Conflicting Division Bench Decisions Resolved. Age relaxation for multiple categories (physically handicapped, reserved category) cannot be cumulated unless rules expressly provide for cumulative benefit.

13 Dec 2018

The Maharashtra Public Service Commission filed two writ petitions challenging orders that allowed cumulative age relaxation to candidates who were bo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

28 May 2020

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds OBC Reservation in All-India Quota Medical Seats — Constitutionality of Reservation for Backward Classes in State-Surrendered Seats Affirmed. Court holds that reservation in AIQ seats is permissible and does not violate the principle of merit, and that the executive can introduce reservation in AIQ seats without legislation.

20 Jan 2022

This judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Section (EWS)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Rajasthan Prabodhak Recruitment Rules Amidst Discrimination Claims. Age Relaxation and Bonus Marks for Teaching Experience Deemed Constitutional, Appeals Dismissed

8 Jul 2024

A batch of 47 appeals before the Supreme Court of India, originating from judgments by the Rajasthan High Court. These appeals pertain to the recruitm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Minority School's Petition Against Age Limit for Junior Clerk Appointment. Government Resolution prescribing maximum appointment age of 33 years held inapplicable to minority institutions under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India.

27 Sep 2019

The petitioner, St. Isabel's High School, a religious minority institution under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India, filed a writ petition und...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Seeking Cumulative Age Relaxation for Government Servant Belonging to OBC Category. Age relaxation for government servants and OBC candidates cannot be cumulated; each relaxation is separate and maximum age limit is fixed.

27 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Shri Dilip V. Sawant, was a Draughtsman Grade-II in the Town and Country Planning Department, Government of Goa, and belonged to the O...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

29 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Professor Seeking Enhanced Retirement Age Under UP Government Notification. Held that a medical teacher who was granted end-of-session extension of service is entitled to benefit of subsequent notification enhancing retirement age from 60 to 65 years, as the extension postpones superannuation.

21 Jan 2020

The appellant, Dr. Chandra Mohan Varma, was a Professor and Head of the Department of Cardiology at LPS Institute of Cardiology, GSVM Medical College,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)