Search Results for "accessory"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "accessory"

95 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Importer's Appeal in Customs Tariff Classification of Laser Imagers — Laser Imagers Held to be Accessories Classifiable Under CTH 9033. Laser Imager Lacking Independent Diagnostic Capability and Compatible with Machines Under Multiple Tariff Headings Falls Under Residuary CTH 9033 00 00, Not CTH 9018 90 19, Under Note 2 to Chapter 90 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute concerned the correct tariff classification of imported 'Dryview 6850 Laser Imagers W/3D' under the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Hybrid Amplifier as General Electronic Item Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Product Not an Accessory of Cable TV. The Court held that the Hybrid Amplifier or Line Extender is a general electronic item covered by schedule entry C-II-126, not an accessory of Cable TV under entry C-II-124.

14 Sep 2018

The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Revenue (Commissioner of Sales Tax)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

29 Mar 2023

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

25 Oct 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CENVAT Credit on Mobile Towers and Prefabricated Buildings for Mobile Service Providers — Interprets 'Capital Goods' and 'Inputs' Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Mobile towers and PFBs are essential for providing telecom services and qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

22 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a batch of appeals concerning the eligibility of mobile service providers (MSPs) to claim CENVAT credit on exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Central Excise Appeal on Service Tax Liability for Veterinary and Testing Services. Assessee Claims Exemption Under Notification No. 13/2003-ST for Commission Agent Services, While Revenue Alleges Taxable Business Auxiliary Services.

28 Aug 2023

The appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 35G of the Central Exci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines State's Sales Tax Revision Petitions Challenging Tribunal's Orders Quashing Re-assessments Under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The Tribunal Had Allowed Taxpayers' Appeals Holding Re-assessments Invalid, Leading the Revenue to File Multiple Revision Petitions.

10 Feb 2023

...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)