Search Results for "Wild Life Protection Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Wild Life Protection Act"

92 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Crop Damage by Wild Animals Under Government Resolution — Bluebulls Damage to Orange Plantation Entitles Farmer to Compensation as Per Government Policy. The court held that the Government Resolution dated 02/7/2010 does not restrict compensation to only yielding crops and denial of compensation is arbitrary and discriminatory.

5 May 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Vimal Haribhau Naik, an agriculturist, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for damage to her orange trees caused by bluebu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wild Elephant Electrocution Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 429 IPC, Sections 135 and 138 of Electricity Act, 2003, and Section 51 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove unauthorized electric connection beyond reasonable doubt.

2 Aug 2021

The appellant, Prabha, was convicted by the I-Additional Sessions & Special Judge, Mysore in Special Case No.75/2008 for offences under Section 429 of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

17 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

20 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

16 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Closure of Byculla Zoo for Failing to Meet Modern Standards of Animal Welfare and Conservation. Zoo's antiquated conditions violate fundamental duty of compassion under Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution and provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

18 Jul 2005

The Bombay High Court delivered an oral judgment on July 18, 2005, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Wild Elephant Electrocution Case Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Accused to Electrified Fencing. Conviction under Wild Life Protection Act, Indian Electricity Act, and IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization of Unauthorized Power Connection.

3 Aug 2021

The appellant, Shivappa, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Spl. Case No.140/2009 for offences under Sections 39 and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

23 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Forest Offence Case Due to Procedural Lapses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Karnataka Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of forest produce beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Jul 2023

The revision petitioner, Pramod S/o Arjun Kanakupakar, was convicted by the Civil Judge & JMFC, Dandeli in C.C.No.735/2010 for offences under Sections...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)