Search Results for "Wild Life Protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Wild Life Protection"

133 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Tiger Skin Trafficking Under Wildlife Protection Act — Conspiracy to Trade in Tiger Skin and Wild Animal Products Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 120-B IPC read with Sections 49, 49-B and 51 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 confirmed based on credible evidence of seizure and conspiracy.

6 Jun 2023

The case pertains to two criminal revision applications filed by Makbool Ahmed (accused no.1) and Rajesh Gujar (accused no.2) challenging their convic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

17 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Claim for Compensation for Husband's Death Due to Wild Boar Attack Under Government Resolution Dated 11th July 2018. The court held that wild boar is a 'wild animal' under the resolution and the rejection was erroneous.

26 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Anuja Arun Redij, is the widow of Shri Arun Arvind Redij, who died on 5th February 2019 due to injuries sustained when a wild boar att...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Bans Mining in Eco-Sensitive Zones Around National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. Minimum 1 km Buffer Zone Mandated to Protect Forest Resources and Wildlife Habitat Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Jun 2022

This judgment arises from a series of interlocutory applications in the ongoing T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India public interest litigati...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Wild Elephant Electrocution Case Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Accused to Electrified Fencing. Conviction under Wild Life Protection Act, Indian Electricity Act, and IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization of Unauthorized Power Connection.

3 Aug 2021

The appellant, Shivappa, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Spl. Case No.140/2009 for offences under Sections 39 and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wild Elephant Electrocution Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 429 IPC, Sections 135 and 138 of Electricity Act, 2003, and Section 51 of Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove unauthorized electric connection beyond reasonable doubt.

2 Aug 2021

The appellant, Prabha, was convicted by the I-Additional Sessions & Special Judge, Mysore in Special Case No.75/2008 for offences under Section 429 of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

16 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

20 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Crop Damage by Wild Animals Under Government Resolution — Bluebulls Damage to Orange Plantation Entitles Farmer to Compensation as Per Government Policy. The court held that the Government Resolution dated 02/7/2010 does not restrict compensation to only yielding crops and denial of compensation is arbitrary and discriminatory.

5 May 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Vimal Haribhau Naik, an agriculturist, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for damage to her orange trees caused by bluebu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Closure of Byculla Zoo for Failing to Meet Modern Standards of Animal Welfare and Conservation. Zoo's antiquated conditions violate fundamental duty of compassion under Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution and provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

18 Jul 2005

The Bombay High Court delivered an oral judgment on July 18, 2005, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (P...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)