Search Results for "Whole-time employment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Whole-time employment"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows State Appeal in Pension Matter — Part-Time Service Not Countable Under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978. Rule 11(2) and 11(4) Exclude Part-Time Employees from 50% Service Counting, and Erroneous Orders Cannot Be Perpetuated Under Article 14.

20 Jul 2026

The dispute arose out of a claim by a former part-time Panchayat Clerk, S. Balakrishnan, who sought counting of 50% of his part-time service for pensi...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Inclusion of Part-Time Teaching Service for Pension; Holds Rule 11(2)(i) of Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 Requires Whole-Time Employment. Part-Time Vocational Instructor’s Claim Rejected as Past Employment Did Not Satisfy Whole-Time Requirement and Employment Ended by Resignation.

2 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by a retired Assistant Registrar of the Madras High Court, seeking to quash an order of the Additional Chief Secretary, Ho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Gramin Dak Sevaks Pension Case — GDS Service Cannot Be Counted for Qualifying Service Under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Court held that service as Gramin Dak Sevak is not 'qualifying service' under the 1972 Rules and cannot be added to regular service for pension eligibility.

8 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from decisions of various Central Administrative Tribunals and High Courts on the common quest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Vice-Chancellor for Holding US Citizenship — Citizenship Requirement Under Section 24(1) of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities Act, 1968 is Mandatory. Petitioner's Appointment as Vice-Chancellor Was Void Ab Initio Due to Lack of Indian Citizenship, and Estoppel Cannot Override Statutory Requirement.

10 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Raviprakash Govindrao Dani, was appointed as Vice-Chancellor of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krushi Vidyapeeth, Akola (respondent No.3) on 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Authority Order Under Contract Labour Act — Union Lacks Locus Standi as Individual Workers Not Parties. Petitioner Union failed to establish that it was a recognized union or that the individual workers were parties to the appeal, and the Appellate Authority's order was not shown to be perverse or illegal.

9 Aug 2016

The petitioners, comprising two individual workers (Ambadas Dattatraya Rahinj and Balasaheb Ashok Londhe) and the Maharashtra Navnirman Kamgar Sanghat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Incentive Scheme for FCI Loaders but Directs Strict Monitoring to Prevent Abuse of Government Funds. Court finds that while the incentive scheme is legal, its implementation has led to exorbitant earnings and siphoning of funds through collusion with officials.

20 Nov 2015

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, took suo motu cognizance of a newspaper report in The Times of India alleging that departmental loaders in Food C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Directing Payment of Gratuity Under Consent Terms — Contractual Obligation Binding Despite Statutory Ineligibility Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971. Consent terms in company petition under Sections 397 and 398 of Companies Act, 1956, requiring payment of gratuity to resigning director, enforced by CLB.

10 Jul 2015

The case arose from a company petition filed by Appellant No.2 before the Company Law Board (CLB) against Appellant No.1 and the Respondent under Sect...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)