Search Results for "Voluntary Disclosure"

332 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 332 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 364 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Satyawan, who was allegedly abducted and killed by the appellants due to a debt dispute. The prosecution's case was...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 120(B), 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeals were filed by accused No.1 (Harish) and accused No.3 (Lokesh @ Sathish) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 25.04.2017 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT Circular Denying Adjustment of TDS Against Tax Payable Under Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. Circular No. 755 dated 25-07-1997 Held Ultra Vires as It Imposed Restriction Not Found in Finance Act, 1997 or Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and its director, filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Scope of Interference Under Section 37 Is Limited and Impugned Order Did Not Suffer From Patent Illegality or Perversity.

The petitioners, Wind World (India) Limited and others, filed an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...