Search Results for "Victim custody"

851 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 851 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366-A, 376, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Milind s/o Govind Pandit, was convicted by the IV Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Beed in Sessions Case No.17/2003 on 1/10/2003 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Mohan Digambar Lokhande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 9 of 2018 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault of a Six-Year-Old Girl Under POCSO Act. Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Pravin S/o Suryabhanji Gube, was convicted by the learned Extra Joint Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur on 12.9.2018 in Special Child P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...