Search Results for "VAT classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "VAT classification"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tax Classification Appeal -- 'Appellants Product' Held as Fruit Drink Under UPVAT Act -- Appellants Succeeds Against Commercial Tax Commissioner

25 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed appeals filed by Appellants challenging the classification of their product under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Mosquito Repellants, Insect Killers, Cleaners, and Antiseptic Liquid Classified Under Respective Entries at 4% VAT Rate. Products like Mortein Mosquito Coil, Mat, Liquid Vaporizer, Mortein Insect Killer, Harpic, Lizol, and Dettol Antiseptic Liquid are held to be classifiable under specific entries of Kerala VAT Act, 2003, attracting 4% tax, not higher residuary rate.

10 Apr 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which dismissed the assessee's appeal and upheld the Commissioner's classification ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in VAT Classification Case, Holds Mobile Crane Wire Ropes Taxable at 4% as Parts of Mobile Cranes. The Court applied the 'essential part' test to determine that wire ropes are integral to mobile cranes, thus falling under Entry 155 of Schedule IV of the Rajasthan VAT Act.

26 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Anti Evasion, Rajasthan, against M/s Prasoon Enterprises and other...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Haryana VAT Act Case Due to Jurisdictional Issue and Misapplication of Precedent. High Court Erred in Dismissing Writ Petition on Alternative Remedy Grounds as Appellant Raised Pure Question of Law Under Section 34 of Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Regarding Revisional Authority's Competence.

1 Feb 2023

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing a civil writ petition filed by the appellant, who challenged the jur...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Works Contract Service Classification Upheld. CENVAT Credit on Input Services for Works Contract Held Inadmissible Under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2 May 2023

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at Allahabad dated 09.11.2017, which allo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commissioner's Appeal in Sales Tax Classification Dispute — Entry C74 'Plastic Footwear' Construed as Requiring Predominant Plastic Content, Not Exclusively Plastic. The product 'Escort 111 SYN Black', though not wholly made of plastic, was held to be covered by Entry C74 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as it was predominantly made of plastic and moulded.

24 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Sales Tax appealed against the decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal which had held that the product 'Escort 111 SYN Blac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commissioner's Appeal in VAT Classification Dispute — Nutritional Supplements Classified as Food Preparations at 5% Tax. The Court upheld the Tribunal's classification under Schedule Entry C-107(11)(g) of the MVAT Act, 2002, rejecting the Commissioner's attempt to reclassify the products as medicaments.

6 May 2016

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Classification. Classification of dealers based on turnover for LBT exemption is valid under Article 14 as it has a rational nexus with the object of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

8 Jan 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and M/s. Vidarbha Distillers, are dealers within the meaning of Section 2(16A) of the Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Case — Repairs/Reconstruction Contracts Covered Under 'Construction Contracts' for Tax Rate Purposes. The Court held that the term 'construction contracts' in Section 42(3) of the MVAT Act read with Notification dated 30 November 2006 includes repairs/reconstruction of buildings, and the rate of tax is 5%.

25 Jul 2017

The appellant, Painterior (India), a registered partnership firm under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act), is engaged in the busines...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)