Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act"

5 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s judgment directing payment of salary for the period 01 January 2015 to 31 May 2018 – Held that respondents had attained superannuation age by 2013 and 2015, respectively.

The age of superannuation must be considered when determining entitlement to back wages and reinstatement benefits. (Paras: 8, 9, 10) Supreme Court h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Part, Enhances Compensation for Daily Wage Worker Instead of Reinstatement. The Court held that reinstatement is not automatic for daily wage workers and monetary compensation is appropriate, especially when the dispute is raised after a long delay.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Uttarakhand against the High Court's order directing reinstatement of a daily wage worker (Beldar) who had...