Search Results for "ULTRATECH CEMENT"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "ULTRATECH CEMENT"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

28 Apr 2026

The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.

28 Jun 2011

The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case. 'ULTRATUFF' Held Deceptively Similar to 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

18 Nov 2011

The respondent-plaintiff, Ultratech Cement Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the appellants-defendants, Alaknan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Trademark Infringement Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Court holds that mere existence of a website accessible in Mumbai does not confer jurisdiction under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 unless the plaintiff has a business or resides within the court's limits.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two appeals (Appeal No.340 of 2015 and Appeal No.95 of 2015) heard together by the Bombay High Court. In the first appeal, the a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Leave to Combine Infringement and Passing Off Causes of Action in UltraTech Trade Marks Case. The court held that under Clause 14 of the Letters Patent, a plaintiff can combine infringement and passing off claims when both arise from the same set of facts and the court has jurisdiction over the infringement claim under Section 134(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

29 Jan 2015

The plaintiffs, Ultratech Cement Ltd. and its parent company, filed a suit alleging infringement of their registered trade marks containing the word '...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Water Cess Levy on Industrial Groundwater Use. Levy under Section 12 of Maharashtra Irrigation Act, 1976 is compensatory and regulatory, not a tax, and validly imposed on industries drawing groundwater for commercial purposes.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by industrial companies—BILT Graphic Paper Products Ltd., UltraTech CemCo Ltd., and Associated Ceme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XIV Letters Patent to Combine Passing Off with Infringement Cause of Action to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings. The court held that once jurisdiction over infringement is established, leave to combine passing off claim should be granted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

18 Jan 2014

The Plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and Another, filed a suit for infringement of their registered trademarks, including 'UltraTech Cement', and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

25 Oct 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

8 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

11 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)