Search Results for "ULC Act surplus land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "ULC Act surplus land"

57 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 57 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Entire Land Area Including Vacant Land — Demand Must Be Limited to Built-Up Area Only. The court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a demand for payment cannot include vacant land as per the Section 20 Exemption Order Schedule.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioners challenged a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Excess Land Due to Repeal and Non-Completion of Proceedings. Demand for Rs 6,09,66,477 raised under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 set aside as proceedings were not finalized before the Act's repeal and the land was not vested in the State.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioners, nine individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.

27 Oct 2016

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Abatement of Urban Land Ceiling Proceedings Under Repeal Act — Land in Green Zone Exempted Under Section 20 of ULC Act, 1976. The court held that since the land was in green zone and exemption was granted, and no possession was taken by the State, the proceedings abated under Section 3 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999.

17 Aug 2010

The petitioners, twelve individuals residing in Kasar Vadavali, Thane, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs State Not to Initiate ULC Proceedings Against Petitioner in Respect of Land Already Declared Surplus in Brother's Name. The Court held that once proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 were concluded against the brother, the same land cannot be subjected to fresh proceedings against the petitioner.

5 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Ningaiah, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondents not to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Abatement of ULC Proceedings and Non-Vesting of Land Under Repeal Act. Landowner's Surplus Land Declaration Under Sections 8(4), 9, and 10 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Held to Have Abated as Physical Possession Not Taken Before Repeal Act Came Into Force.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Tarabai Tulshiram Meshram, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that all proceedings under Sections 9 and 10 of the Urban ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging ULCR Act Vesting Notification Due to Non-Specification of Vesting Date and Repeal of Principal Act. Notification under Section 10(3) of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 invalid for not specifying date of vesting; proceedings abated as possession not taken.

8 Aug 2014

The petitioner, M/s Anupam Insulating Industries, owned land at mouza Nagalwadi, Hingna, Nagpur, admeasuring 6.07 HR. Out of this, 59000 sq. mtr. was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Premium Demand on Entire Land in ULC Repeal Case — Demand Must Be Limited to Vacant Land Only. The Court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a premium demand for the entire land including built-up area is impermissible; only vacant land as per the exemption order can be subject to premium.

9 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Modern Paints, a partnership firm, acquired land in Oshiwara, Mumbai, under a conveyance dated 12 June 1975. On 1 August 1977, it file...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Validly Taken Under Section 10(5) of ULC Act Before Repeal. Application Under Section 21 Was Barred by Limitation, and Repeal Did Not Affect Lands Where Possession Was Already Taken.

6 May 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning surplus land under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The appellants, legal representatives...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Declaring Abatement of ULC Proceedings and Non-Vesting of Land in State Government. Land purchased after repeal of Urban Land Ceiling Act does not vest in State as proceedings had abated under Section 4 of Repeal Act.

8 Mar 2023

The petitioners, Acres and Meters Infrastructure (a partnership firm) and Sudhir Dupare, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that proceedings ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)