1665396120_limbs-faq
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Tribunals"
2042 result(s) found
Found 2042 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.
27 Nov 2020The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...
- 213
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.
1 Jan 1970The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...
- 85
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Writ Petition by Presiding Officers Seeking 6th Pay Commission Pay Scales for CGIT-cum-Labour Courts. Petitioners Claim Parity with Other Central Tribunals and Challenge Grouping with District Judiciary Under Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.
1 Jan 1970The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by two Presiding Officers of Central Government Industrial Tribunals-cum-Labour Court...
- 34
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal — Power to Abolish SATs Upheld Under General Clauses Act and Article 323-A. The Court held that the Union Government has the power to abolish a State Administrative Tribunal established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and the notification dated 2 August 2019 is valid.
21 Mar 2023The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Orissa High Court judgment upholding the abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT). The ...
- 210
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 21(5) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1989 Allowing Non-Judicial Member as President of Tribunal. Challenge to Appointment of IAS Officer as President Dismissed as Provision Does Not Violate Basic Structure.
28 Sep 2017The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association and its President filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of...
- 88
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal on NGT's Suo Motu Jurisdiction. The Court held that the National Green Tribunal lacks suo motu powers under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, as it is a statutory tribunal without inherent jurisdiction, but can act on epistolary jurisdiction based on letters from interested parties.
7 Oct 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appeal led by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against Ankita Sinha and others, addressed the jurisd...
- 486
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies High Court's Writ Jurisdiction Over Armed Forces Tribunal Orders in Service Matters. The court held that orders of the Armed Forces Tribunal are amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution, as judicial review is part of the basic structure and Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 saves such jurisdiction, ensuring litigants have access to justice where alternative appeals are limited.
21 Mar 2023The judgment addressed a legal conundrum regarding the amenability of Armed Forces Tribunal orders to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution ...
- 673
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Administrative Tribunals Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds - High Court at Calcutta Found Lacking Jurisdiction to Review Transfer Order Passed by Principal Bench at New Delhi. Judicial Review of Tribunal Transfer Orders Under Article 226/227 Lies with High Court Within Whose Territorial Jurisdiction the Tribunal Bench Passing the Order is Located, Not Where Original Application Was Filed Under Section 25 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
6 Jan 2022The Supreme Court addressed a jurisdictional question concerning judicial review of transfer orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal unde...
- 296
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.
21 Dec 2016This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...
- 143
