Search Results for "Tribal Land Transfer"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Involving Tribal Land Transfer. Decree for specific performance of agreement to sell tribal land to non-tribal can be granted subject to obtaining permission under Section 36A of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The appellant, Babasaheb Dhondiba Kute, a non-tribal, entered into an agreement dated 31.07.2001 with the respondent, Radhu Vithoba Barde, a tribal, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Overturns M.R.T. Decision on Land Dispute: Retroactive Tribal Status Claims Unwarranted. Petitioners' 1968 Land Transaction Validated as Tribal Status Change Occurred Post-Transaction; 32-Year Delay Deemed Barred by Law

The writ petition challenges the order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (M.R.T.), Aurangabad, regarding a land dispute. The petitioners clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Order Setting Aside Tribal Land Transfer. Transfer Between Tribals Not Barred Under Section 36(2) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Tulsiram Adku Marape and Namdeo Adku Marape, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Resolution Transferring Ashram School to Third Party Without Considering Petitioner's Proposal. Transfer of Management of Tribal Ashram School Must Follow Due Process and Consider All Eligible Applicants Under the Maharashtra Tribal Development Department Guidelines.

The petitioner, Gramoddhar Vidya Prasarak Shikshan Sanstha, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, filed a writ petition seeking t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Petitioner's Long Possession as Tenant Does Not Bar Restoration.

The petitioner, Hirakant Ramchandra Kothari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 23...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Non-Tribal Purchaser's Challenge to Vesting of Land Under Section 5A of Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. Earlier Dropping of Proceedings Under Section 3 Does Not Bar Subsequent Deemed Acquisition Under Section 5A.

The petitioners, non-tribals, purchased agricultural land in Mouza-Vilam, Taluka Nagbhid, District Chandrapur, by a registered sale deed dated 8.2.197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Non-Tribal Purchaser's Challenge to Land Confiscation Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Transfer of tribal land without prior sanction is void, and subsequent purchaser acquires no title, upholding forfeiture for distribution to tribals.

The petitioner, Smt. Urmila Ahuja, a non-tribal, purchased land measuring 6.90 acres in Village Khapri, Tahsil Kalmeshwar, District Nagpur, on 10.12.1...