Search Results for "Tiger Reserve"

25 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 25 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Wildlife Protection Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 39 and 40 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession of animal articles beyond reasonable doubt.

The petitioner, Boraiah @ Boregowda @ Papanna, was originally acquitted by the trial court (Civil Judge (Jr. Dn.) & JMFC, Gundlupet) in C.C.No.494/200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Wildlife Crime Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 9 and 39(a) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Section 379 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove possession or sale of tiger skin beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by two petitioners (accused Nos. 3 and 4) challenging their conviction under Sections 9 and 39...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Monitors CBI Investigation into Illegal Construction and Tree Felling in Corbett Tiger Reserve — Environmental Degradation Case. The Court took suo moto cognizance of illegal construction and tree felling in Corbett Tiger Reserve and monitored the CBI investigation.

The Supreme Court was seized of a suo moto matter concerning illegal construction and rampant felling of trees in the Corbett Tiger Reserve. The High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Defines Aravali Hills and Ranges for Conservation in T.N. Godavarman Case. Court adopts scientific definition based on geological and ecological criteria to prevent desertification and protect biodiversity across Delhi, Haryana, Gujarat, and Rajasthan.

The Supreme Court of India, in its inherent jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution, addressed the critical issue of defining 'Aravali Hills...