Search Results for "Tata Housing"

180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Society's Challenge to Labour Court and Gratuity Proceedings. Ex-Manager's Claims Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act and Payment of Gratuity Act Dismissed as Society is Neither an 'Industry' Nor an 'Establishment'.

The Petitioner, Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is a cooperative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Petition Challenging Ombudsman Award in Favor of Widow in Housing Loan Insurance Claim. Non-Disclosure of Pre-Existing Conditions Not Material to Risk, Ombudsman's Award Upheld.

This case involves a widow, Gauri V. Raut (Respondent No. 2), whose husband, along with her father-in-law and brother-in-law, passed away within a spa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Allotment of Government Land to Proposed Housing Society Due to Nepotism and Favoritism. Allotment Violated Land Revenue Rules and Government Regulations as Society's Members Were Not Eligible and Composition Changed Repeatedly.

The appellant, Proposed Vaibhav Cooperative Housing Society Limited, challenged the allotment of a government plot to Medinova Regal Co-operative Hous...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tata Memorial Centre's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Finding on Appropriate Government. State Government Held as Appropriate Government for Autonomous Body Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, Making Union's Complaint Maintainable.

The Bombay High Court dismissed four writ petitions filed by Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) challenging decisions of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.

The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Developer Challenging Quashing of Environmental Clearance for Housing Project Near Sukhna Wildlife Sanctuary. Project Located in Catchment Area of Sukhna Lake Requires Central Government Clearance Under Category 'A' of EIA Notification.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Tata Housing Development Company Ltd. (Tata HDCL) against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...