Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

763 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 763 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representations for Revenue Entries in Land Grant Cases. Petitioners' claim for revenue entries based on grant orders and Saguvalli Chits to be considered by Tahsildar within three months.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioners, Sri Ulluraiah, Smt Siddagangamma, and Sri Lingappa, filed separate writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition, Sets Aside Tahsildar's Order for Possession Without Reasons Under Section 32P(g) of B.T. and A.L. Act. The court held that the Tahsildar must give reasons and conduct an enquiry before taking possession from the tenant.

19 Jan 2005

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural land, challenged the order of the Tahsildar dated 19-9-1986, which took possession of the land from them and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Direction to Conclude Revenue Enquiry in Land Title Dispute. Court Directs Tahsildar to Complete Enquiry Within Eight Weeks Based on Earlier Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, R. Sakthivel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third resp...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Patta Rejection for Violation of Natural Justice — Directs Reconsideration After Hearing. Tahsildar's Rejection of Patta Application Without Notice or Hearing Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Disposal.

6 Jan 2025

The petitioners, R.Essakimuthu, D.Vanaraja, and D.Bharathiraja, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madura...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes Petition Seeking Direction for Enquiry on Patta Name Removal. Court issues mandamus under Article 226 directing Tahsildar to decide representation within twelve weeks.

10 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Ramu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Petitioner's Representation for Patta Inclusion Under Tamil Nadu Agricultural Lands Record of Tenancy Act, 1967. The court directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation for inclusion of his name in patta within twelve weeks, as the representation was pending for a long period without any action.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, V. Jayaraj, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tahsildar's Endorsement Denying Mutation in Land Revenue Dispute — Petitioners' Title and Possession Upheld Despite Alleged Irregularities in Sale Deeds. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Tahsildar Cannot Adjudicate Title Disputes Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

26 Feb 2019

The petitioners, Smt. R. Suguna and Siddarth Sarnaik, purchased 8 acres of land in Sy.No.42 of Navarathna Agrahara, Jala Hobli, Bengaluru North Taluk,...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Revenue Divisional Officer's Order for Violation of Natural Justice; Survey Petition Closed Due to Pending Civil Suits. The Court Held That An Order Passed Without Furnishing Documents and Without Hearing the Aggrieved Party Is Invalid, and Remanded for Fresh Enquiry.

6 Mar 2025

The petitioner, R. Muthukrishnan, filed two writ petitions before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. In W.P.(MD)No.3219 of 2023, he sought a ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)