High Court of Karnataka Directs Tahsildar to Consider Representations for Revenue Entries in Land Grant Cases. Petitioners' claim for revenue entries based on grant orders and Saguvalli Chits to be considered by Tahsildar within three months.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 104
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Sri Ulluraiah, Smt Siddagangamma, and Sri Lingappa, filed separate writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. They sought a direction to the Tahsildar, Doddaballapura Taluk, to make revenue entries (MR and RTC) in their names in respect of land in Survey No.103 of Ramadevanahalli Village, Madhure Hobli, Doddaballapura Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District. The petitioners claimed to be holders of grant orders and Saguvalli Chits for the said land. They had submitted representations to the Tahsildar on 19.03.2018 (in WP 36433/2018) and 26.03.2018 (in WP 36430/2018 and WP 36431/2018) requesting the entries, but the Tahsildar had not taken any action. The court, after hearing the counsel for the petitioners and the Additional Government Advocate for the respondents, disposed of the petitions with a direction to the Tahsildar to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of the order. The court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the petitioners' claim.

Headnote

A) Land Revenue - Grant of Land - Revenue Entries - Petitioners, grant holders of land in Survey No.103, sought direction to Tahsildar to make revenue entries (MR and RTC) based on grant orders and Saguvalli Chits - Court held that the Tahsildar must consider the representations dated 19.03.2018 and 26.03.2018 in accordance with law, within three months - No opinion on merits of the claim (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tahsildar is obligated to consider the petitioners' representations for making revenue entries based on grant orders and Saguvalli Chits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Tahsildar, Doddaballapura Taluk, to consider the representations dated 19.03.2018 and 26.03.2018 submitted by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of the order. No opinion is expressed on the merits of the petitioners' claim.

Law Points

  • Grant of land
  • Saguvalli Chit
  • Revenue entries
  • MR
  • RTC
  • Representation
  • Consideration
  • Writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (04) 32

Writ Petition No.36433/2018 (KLR-RR/SUR) c/w W.P.Nos.36430/2018, 36431/2018, 36432/2018

2019-04-16

S.N.Satyanarayana

Sri N.V.Manjunath (for petitioners), Sri Venkatesh Dodderi (AGA for respondents)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking direction to Tahsildar to make revenue entries based on grant orders and Saguvalli Chits.

Remedy Sought

Direction to the Tahsildar to make revenue entries (MR and RTC) in the name of the petitioners in respect of land in Survey No.103 of Ramadevanahalli Village.

Filing Reason

Failure of the Tahsildar to consider the petitioners' representations for making revenue entries.

Issues

Whether the Tahsildar is bound to consider the petitioners' representations for making revenue entries based on grant orders and Saguvalli Chits.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners submitted that they are holders of grant orders and Saguvalli Chits and have made representations to the Tahsildar which have not been considered. Respondents did not file any objections; the AGA submitted that the Tahsildar would consider the representations in accordance with law.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tahsildar is obligated to consider representations made by grant holders for revenue entries and pass orders in accordance with law, but the court does not adjudicate on the merits of the claim.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners are said to be the holders of grant order/certificate and Saguvalli Chit in respect of the land in question. The Tahsildar is directed to consider the representations and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within three months.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The court heard the matter and disposed of the petitions on 16.04.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate op...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Directs Compliance with Earlier Order in Property Tax Dispute — Municipal Corporation Ordered to Place Officer's Decision on Record. The court perused an earlier Division Bench order and directed the concerned officer to place the...