Search Results for "Suo-motu enquiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Suo-motu enquiry"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Discharges Respondents in Suo Motu Criminal Contempt for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Orders. Court holds that mere breach of undertaking does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes or lowers authority of court.

28 Aug 2018

The High Court of Bombay initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against respondent no.1 (M.N. Navale, President of Sinhgad Technical Educati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Order in Ceiling Surplus Land Case — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing to Petitioner Before Declaring Land as Surplus Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Renders Order Unsustainable.

11 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Narayan Sonaji Patil (since deceased, represented by legal representatives), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Time-Barred Suo Motu Enquiry. Additional Commissioner Cannot Initiate Second Suo Motu Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 After First Remand Order Had Attained Finality.

10 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttamrao Ghatge, was a landholder from Salapuri, Parbhani, who filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (C...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Ceiling Proceedings Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act — Petitioner Not Declared Surplus Land Holder. The court upheld the Additional Commissioner's order setting aside the Tribunal's finding that the petitioner was not a surplus holder.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, a resident of village Zari, Taluka and District Parbhani, was subjected to proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceili...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Determination Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling Holdings) Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Error in Tribunal's Finding That He Was a Non-Surplus Holder.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Keshavrao s/o Vaijoba Deshmukh, a resident of Lohgaon, Taluka and District Parbhani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Co...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Declaration Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Appear or Argue, No Merit Found.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Vishwanath s/o Narsing Sodgir, a resident of Gangakhed, District Beed, filed a writ petition challenging the declaration of surplus la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Surplus Land Declaration Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner Failed to Appeal Tribunal Order Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Within Reasonable Time.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Bhayyasaheb Babasaheb Aher, a resident of Umapur, Taluka Georai, District Beed, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Petition Challenging Notice Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 for Non-Prosecution. Petitioner Failed to Appear or Take Steps to Prosecute the Petition, Leading to Dismissal.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Qader Khan s/o Ismail Khan, a resident of Parbhani district, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Reopening Enquiry. Suo Moto Enquiry Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdings Act, 1961 Cannot Be Initiated After 17 Years from Original Order.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Ashok Rangrao Deshmukh, a resident of Parbhani, filed returns under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands Ceiling on Holdin...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)