Search Results for "Sub-Registrar register"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition to Quash FIR Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Due to False Allegations and Malicious Prosecution. The court quashed the FIR as the allegations were found to be false and motivated, and the wife had made contradictory statements.

The petitioner, Sangeeta Santosh Kadam, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands for Fresh Consideration Due to Failure to Frame Points for Determination. The appellate court's judgment was set aside for non-compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and the matter was remanded for fresh disposal.

The original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by his legal heir) filed a suit for removal of encroachment against defendant nos.1 and 2, claimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Registration of Document Despite Pending Stamp Duty Adjudication — Period of Adjudication Excluded for Limitation Under Section 23 of Registration Act. Sub-Registrar Cannot Refuse Registration on Ground of Pending Adjudication Under Section 31 of Maharashtra Stamp Act.

The petitioner, Snehanjali Electronics and Trading Private Limited, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Andheri I (Respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...