Search Results for "Sub-Registrar's duty"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Time Was Essence of Contract; Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld. Breach by Buyer in Agreements to Sell Land in Gurgaon Leads to Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance and Refund of Earnest Money.

The case involves a dispute over two agreements to sell agricultural land in Gurgaon, executed on 17.02.2004, between the appellants (sellers) and the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Registration of Document Despite Pending Stamp Duty Adjudication — Period of Adjudication Excluded for Limitation Under Section 23 of Registration Act. Sub-Registrar Cannot Refuse Registration on Ground of Pending Adjudication Under Section 31 of Maharashtra Stamp Act.

The petitioner, Snehanjali Electronics and Trading Private Limited, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Sub-Registrar, Andheri I (Respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit, Dismisses Caveat by Heirs. Court Declares Will Dated 3rd December 1988 as Valid Last Will and Testament of Deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav, Orders Issuance of Letter of Administration.

The case pertains to a testamentary dispute concerning the Will of deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav. The plaintiffs, Subhash Hirji Jadhav and his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Will in Testamentary Suit — Dismisses Caveat by Other Heirs. Will dated 3rd December 1988 executed by deceased Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav proved as last Will and Testament; letter of administration granted to plaintiffs.

The case involves a testamentary dispute concerning the Will of Hiroo @ Hiraji Laxman Jadhav, who died on 3rd December 1988. The plaintiffs, Subhash H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Development Agreement — Agreement Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Development Agreement Held Chargeable Under Article 5(ga) at 1% of Consideration, Not Market Value.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasun Developers, challenged orders of the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, Pune, and the Deputy Inspector Gene...