Search Results for "Stolen Property"

428 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder for Gain Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 449, 380 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Chandrasekar, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul, for the murder of a woman and for robbery. The prosecution allege...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances, Particularly with Recovery of Gold Chain Lacking Corroboration.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Conviction in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the testimony of a single witness (PW8) without corroboration and unreliable identification cannot sustain a conviction under Section 395 IPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, in Sessions Case No.1505/99. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Special Court Convicts Broker and Beneficiaries in BMC Bank Securities Fraud; Acquits Employees and Other Brokers. Broker Held Liable for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Under Section 411 IPC, While Beneficiaries Convicted of Cheating Under Section 420 IPC.

The case involved a criminal trial before the Special Court under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dacoity Stolen Property Case Due to Lack of Proof of Knowledge. Conviction under Sections 411 and 412 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish that appellants knew or had reason to believe the recovered ornaments were proceeds of dacoity.

The appellants, Ashok Suryabhan Kale and Bhausaheb Suryabhan Kale, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Accused in Dacoity Case, Converts Conviction to Section 411 IPC Based on Insufficient Presumption. Recovery of Stolen Cloth from Cloth Merchant Not Sufficient to Infer Participation in Dacoity Under Illustration (a) of Section 114 Evidence Act, 1872.

The case arose from a dacoity in which cloth, ornaments, and cash were stolen from a shop. The appellant, Sheo Nath, was a cloth merchant whose house ...