Search Results for "Stepping up of pay"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal of Headmistress Against Refixation of Pay. Court Holds That Employee Promoted to Higher Cadre Cannot Claim Pay Parity with Junior in Lower Cadre Under G.O.Ms.237 and Rule 4(3) of Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 1989.

The appellant, serving as Headmistress in an aided school, appealed against the dismissal of her writ petition seeking refixation of her pay. She was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Appeal in Stepping Up of Pay Case — Directs Consideration Under Government Order. Senior Teacher's Claim for Pay Parity with Junior to Be Examined Under G.O.Ms.No.164 Dated 16.07.2025.

The Director of Elementary Education filed a writ appeal against an order dated 26.06.2024 in WP No. 2436/2022. The respondent, A. Rajendran, a B.T. A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Pay Anomaly Case — Stepping Up of Pay Allowed Despite Transfer Between Panchayat Unions. Rule 9 of Tamil Nadu Elementary Education Subordinate Service Rules does not bar stepping up of pay when juniors draw higher pay due to subsequent promotion.

The case pertains to a writ appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu challenging an order dated 23.01.2023 in W.P.No.13232 of 2016, which allowed the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Directly Recruited Assistant Professors Seeking Stepping Up of Pay Based on Juniors' Pay. Rule 21 of Gujarat Civil Services (Pay) Rules, 2002 Not Applicable Where Anomaly Arises from Counting of Ad Hoc Services of Junior Colleagues.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by directly recruited Assistant Professors (the appellants) against the judgment of the Division ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Pay Anomaly Case - Stepping Up of Pay Not Permissible Under FR 22 When Junior's Higher Pay Is Due to ACP Scheme, Not Promotion. The Court held that FR 22 does not apply when the junior's higher pay is due to ACP upgradation, which is not a promotion.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against a judgment of the Karnataka High Court, which had allowed writ petitions filed by two employ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Assured Career Progression Scheme Benefits to Forest Guard — Petitioner Entitled to ACPS from Date of Completion of 16 Years of Service as per Government Memorandum dated 22/2/2001. Denial of ACPS on ground of prior promotions held arbitrary and discriminatory.

The petitioner, Shri Raghunath B. Desai, a Forest Guard employed by the State of Goa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Stepping Up of Pay in Telecom Department Service Matter — Senior Employee Not Entitled to Equal Pay with Junior Due to Different Promotion Dates and Lack of Arbitrariness

The petitioner, Shri Dayashanker Dashrat Chaubey, was a Phone Inspector in the Department of Telecommunication who entered service on 16th October 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CAT Order Directing Stepping Up of Increment in Pay Fixation — Overstay Period Not Relevant for Increment Date. The court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal's order was based on irrelevant considerations and set it aside.

The petitioners, the Director of National Institute of Virology and others, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal which directed...