Search Results for "Standing Order 1059"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging NOC Requirement for Construction Near Naval Area. Court holds that the requirement of NOC from Naval authorities for construction within 500 meters of naval installation is valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Dolby Builders Private Ltd. and its shareholder Girish Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the requirement of a No Objection C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Special Public Prosecutor in Sessions Case — No Bias Found. Professional acquaintance between prosecutor and victim does not disqualify appointment under Section 24 CrPC.

The petitioners, Shivaji Rajaram Take and Sharad Shivaji Take, are the original accused in Sessions Case No.12 of 2020 pending before the Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to LPG Distributor Selection Guidelines and Advertisement. Guidelines Providing for Objective Criteria Including Land Ownership and Financial Capacity Upheld as Valid.

The petitioners, Suresh Pralhad Pawar and Balasaheb Mahadeo Kshirsagar, filed writ petitions challenging the advertisement dated 27th July 2011 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Termination of Probationer Without Inquiry. Automatic Termination Clause in Appointment Letter Held Invalid as Termination Was Stigmatic and Required Domestic Inquiry Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, WIKA Instruments India Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and award of the Labour Court dated 14 November 2011, which held that the te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement and Backwages Due to Limitation Under Section 42(4) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Approach Notice Filed Beyond Stipulated Period Without Sufficient Cause, Hence Labour Court's Order Set Aside.

The petitioner, Pedru Mozes Fernandes, was a permanent workman employed as a boiler serviceman at Tata Mills from 1st March 1973. He worked continuous...